Well, that was something special, wasn’t it?
Yesterday’s 13th round of the 2023/24 UCI Cyclocross World Cup in Benidorm had almost everything you could want from a bike race (apart from designated cycle parking, of course, but that’s another story).
> Don’t take your bike to the cyclocross! World Cup organiser bans fans’ bikes from course “for safety reasons” (but don’t worry, you can park your car nearby)
In a thriller of a women’s race on the fast, technical circuit bang in the centre of the much-maligned Spanish tourist resort, world champion Fem van Empel just about got the better of Puck Pieterse, diving past her eternal rival on one of the last few corners before holding her off in the sprint for the line, after a close-fought, blow-for-blow encounter.
(Zubiko/SWpix.com)
While Van Empel took the win in the rainbow jersey, World Cup leader Ceylin del Carmen Alvarado also earned her fair share of plaudits, recovering from a recent back injury and a difficult opening spell to claw herself back into contention by the final lap, only to be finally dropped by the dominant leading due on the course’s long and decisive road climb.
(Zubiko/SWpix.com)
And then, just when you were thinking you’d already been treated to a feast of ‘cross action, all hell broke loose on the Costa Brava in the men’s race, billed as this season’s unofficial world championships thanks to the presence of the so-called ‘Big Three’.
First off, Mathieu van der Poel – aiming for his 11th consecutive ‘cross victory during what had been an unbeaten winter – was forced off his bike in the opening corners, as a 20 second-plus gap quickly opened to the leaders.
Faced with this unexpected barrier to his normally serene path to victory, the world champion then unleashed the kind of shock and awe we all know he’s capable of, producing one of the images of the winter as he scorched through the field on the climb like a hot Dutch knife through ‘cross butter:
But then, on the penultimate lap, after a frenetic, constantly evolving race where riders drifted in and out of contention throughout, Van der Poel’s unbeaten season finally came to a thudding end in a crash missed by the TV cameras, the world champion’s shoulder colliding equally as hard with a course-side pole (no easy bouncing off the crash protection while cutting the corner this time, Mathieu).
Now, that looked painful.
And that was that. Or so we thought. After dispatching the brilliant European champion Michael Vanthourenhout, Van Aert – racing his final ‘cross lap of the season – looked to have the win in the bag, and duly opted to take the final barriers a touch more conservatively, neglecting to bunny hop them in favour of a quick dismount.
Then, in a moment that will be played over and over again long after his career is over, the Visma-Lease a Bike star made a right pig’s ear of his remount, crashing to the ground, before – unbeknownst to most viewers at the time – kicking off his saddle as he scrambled back onto his bike.
Fortunately for Van Aert, he had already done enough to secure the victory just ahead of Vanthourenhout – but, judging by the post-race photos of his saddle-less bike, those last few corners couldn’t have been overly comfortable for the Belgian…
Ouch...
Or maybe he’ll just jot it down as some much-needed practice for the discomfort of Paris-Roubaix? Anyway, they almost certainly explain his very upright, very careful celebration:
Careful, Wout (Zubiko/SWpix.com)
Oh, and what about the other member of cyclocross’s Big Three, Tom Pidcock?
Well, after a plucky ride throughout the race, and some attacks off the front, the bike handling boy wonder of cycling was let down by his, ahem, bike handing, crashing out of the top five after misjudging the kind of bunny hops he eats for breakfast.
Carnage, pure carnage. But at least we can all laugh about it now…
Cyclocross. What a sport.
Add new comment
62 comments
Am missing the irony there? We do realise this is a parody account, don't we?
Are you sure?
Donny or Peted76? There is no evidence that I have seen that Donny is a parody. Certainly breaches the rules on Parody accounts being clearly labelled.
How very dare you!
The post was grammatically ambiguous!
I'm not so sure.. I had a quick butchers (pun intended) and I didn't see much irony.. the only 'funny' bit I saw was him tagging in Sandford Police a couple of times.. but even they seemed to reply to him in all seriousness. I think he might actually be 'that thick'.
I agreed though I would replace Thick with "that much of a PoS".
A tale of two (reported) drivers
https://bikeworcester.org.uk/2024/01/a-tale-of-two-reported-drivers/
That's quite worrying. Bob sounds exactly the sort of person who shouldn't be allowed to drive. I'm curious if he has a criminal record, has extreme right wing views or if he's a football fan. There does seem to be a correlation between those with an irrational hatred of cyclists, a criminal past, far right views and football.
You're not a fan of the beautiful game then ?
I've been a season ticket holder for a premiership team for 10 years. I watch my son play regularly with his team. But I've also seen how many bile filled anti-cycling posts there are on the Interweb and when I've bothered to look further, it's of note how almost all of them are from people who follow football closely.
Often with replies such as 'always kickball supporters' , 'I knew it would be kickball before I looked at the profile'.
well in all the years Ive been going to football matches, I cant say Ive ever noted that correlation, indeed Ive sat next to one season ticket holder at a game who spent more of the match watching a stage of La Vuelta on their phone than the action on the pitch.
Wow. What a contrast with Gloucestershire. I found this link on the site as well with guidance on submissions.
https://bikeworcester.org.uk/2023/06/operation-snap-submission-guidance/
Standout points to me are 20second videos are fine and will save the officer time and you will get a confirmation email and a follow up email after review. Contrast with Glos who want 2 minutes either side and will not get back to you.
Also a close pass map
https://bikeworcester.org.uk/2023/06/close-pass-map/
I see they put for one of the ones they won't take action on
"Driver overtaking person on a bike by crossing solid central white line"
Must be lancs influence !
"Driver overtaking person on a bike by crossing solid central white line"
Must be Lancs influence !
https://upride.cc/incident/b5hol_tanker_closepassdwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/dhw5w_velar_dwlcross/
They didn't do anything if the driver doesn't cross the line either. Here is a reply I got after I had submitted a close pass where the diver came very close at speed but didn't cross the white lines. I can't comment on what the situation is now as I don't get any feedback since they went to op snap.
"In terms of videos you send us I can’t give you a simple flow chart where the answer is pre-determined. There will always be a degree of subjectivity in all decisions. If you are passed close by a vehicle and this causes you to swerve or brake sharply this would be a factor we would consider. There is no offence of close passing.
For example I was sent a video yesterday of a cyclist on a 50 mph road doing more than 10 mph. The road had double white lines down the middle so by the letter of the law no-one can overtake the cyclist as he is going too fast and you can’t break the lines. One car did break the white lines – committing a traffic offence. The next vehicle squeezed between the white lines and the cyclist. Sticking to the letter of the law but I would say performing a more dangerous and inconsiderate manoeuvre."
Obviously the PC concerned was doing his best and he took the time to get back to me. I suspect it was a training issue or perhaps they had tried to enforce an incident in the past and the prosecution failed to achieve a conviction in court. I witnessed the standard of the prosecutors when I did jury service.
If you are passed close by a vehicle and this causes you to swerve or brake sharply this would be a factor we would consider
I have today been taken to task by Hirsute for recalling the days when Essex (may have been the police on their own, or the rubbishy 'Partnership' they have there now) justified the 'we're not doing anything, Whingeing Cyclist' decision because the close-passed cyclist hadn't 'wobbled or braked'. Hirsute says it's not like that in Essex now. However, the baton has clearly been passed to Bungle's OpSnap's Dodging Department. Bungle is, as usual, too charitable in asserting that, obviously, the PC 'was doing his best'. No he bloody wasn't, the lying b*****d- it's doesn't take even a PC's intellect to realise that there is no time to swerve or brake when you suffer assaults like these. If you were the sort of cyclist who went to pieces when close-passed, you'd be dead by now!
https://upride.cc/incident/ca70mkc_citroenvan_closepass/
https://upride.cc/incident/pe69ooc_clio_closepassspeed/
Even the anti-cyclist, useless, idle police know this despite almost none of them having any sort of clue about cycling or empathy with cyclists
I can see how you have come to the conclusions you have about Lancs police and I have nothing but admiration for your tenacity at trying to get somewhere with them. I am afraid though that you will have to accept that some forces are getting better. If you read the link that @hirsute gave in his original post you will see that West Mercia are cooperating fully with the local cycling group and acting on reports they send in, they even got given cameras.
From a graph that @hirsure posted recently it looked like Gloucestershire improved for a while before reverting to NFA.
https://road.cc/content/news/cycling-live-blog-19-january-2024-306271
I suspect the officer was hinting that I should swerve or brake so that he could do something. Unfortunately, like you, I don't usually have the presecence of mind in the heat of the moment and concentrate on not getting killed.
There is hope though, GLOS have just arrested a driver on suspicion of attempted murder for seriously injuring a cyclist. Should be interesting.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/attempted-mur...
This is what they claimed for Dec 23
This is what they claimed for Dec 23
The important part of NIP is 'intended'. Unless people can be bothered to follow them up in the manner of Cycling Mikey, these are apt to be binned by the police for any excuse, often blamed on CPS because 'nothing to do with us, squire'. I think that most of those NIPS are abandoned without telling the reporter, while accepting that my view has been terminally jaundiced by the conduct of the bent police here. When they refuse to tell you the actual outcome when you inquire, usually citing GDPR, you know it was either nothing at all or 'words of advice'
Likelihood of 'Donny' or any of the other self-incriminating cocksockets getting a NIP ... or anything... from the Police is the square root of fuck-all.
Sandford Police have come out in support of cycling mikey !
"If people didn’t drive like bellends then Michael wouldn’t have any drivers to report So is it the drivers fault, or Michael’s fault?"
although someone did try and rebalance their posts with
"Michael hypnotises the drivers to make them drive like bell ends so that he has content for his u toob channel. He makes £71.75 from every video he publishes, or £80.08 if he can make the driver swear."
I have to admit I find sticking anything on youtube without the consent of the people concerned a pretty bad idea. He should forward the material to the police to the police if it's a police matter.
Not really sure what you mean.
CM puts stuff up after court cases have been concluded
Black Belt Barister covers youtube videos here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxxzOoWpW1c
and concludes there is nothing illegal and very little anyone can do except in very specific circumstances.
It strikes me as petty and a bit vindictive, at least if I am thinking of the same bloke. It's one thing to show examples of bad driving, which can be instructive. But publicising registration numbers, showing arguments with drivers etc., has no real value other than to punish the divers in question. And, IMO, punishing people should be left to the courts.
How do you propose the average person can show bad driving without showing the reg ? And unless you show a good portion of video, then the comments are 'what happened before'. Not sure how you find out who the driver is from the reg.
What do you make of dashcam channels on youtube ?
Depends on the channel, I suppose. The ones I've seen just show examples of bad driving without all the other stuff.
Good point, the police clearly can't, sometimes even with a video of the driver with his distinctive tattoos!
I have to admit I find sticking anything on youtube without the consent of the people concerned a pretty bad idea
Then this is the wrong website for you! Cheerio!
PS There may well be a job for you at Lancashire Constabulary
Pages